本篇文章给大家谈谈BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse),同时本文还将给你拓展009-blockusign-基于blockstack的加密文档签名工具dapp、Ad
本篇文章给大家谈谈BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse),同时本文还将给你拓展009-blockusign-基于blockstack的加密文档签名工具dapp、Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt三款去广告扩展的评测、block.ClusterBlockException: blocked by: [SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE/1/state not recovered / initialized];、c – 为什么push_back签名是void push_back(const value_type&val)不是void push_back(value_type val)?等相关知识,希望对各位有所帮助,不要忘了收藏本站喔。
本文目录一览:- BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)
- 009-blockusign-基于blockstack的加密文档签名工具dapp
- Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt三款去广告扩展的评测
- block.ClusterBlockException: blocked by: [SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE/1/state not recovered / initialized];
- c – 为什么push_back签名是void push_back(const value_type&val)不是void push_back(value_type val)?
BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)
今天在调试cocos2d-x的时候 出现bug :Debug Assertion Failed!
Expression:_BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)
移除了栈的内存,这里栈会被系统自动处理 ,低级错误!!!
009-blockusign-基于blockstack的加密文档签名工具dapp
本篇文章主要介绍blockusign相关内容。
简述blockusign
A decentralized, encrypted document signing tool where you own and control your own documents, contracts and data. It is built on Blockstack。
blockusign是基于Blockstack构建的一个去中心化的、加密的文档签名工具,您自己拥有,控制你自己的文档。
- 目前测试只支持PDF文档
Github地址:https://github.com/ntheile/bl...
官网地址:https://blockusign.co/
页面展现
操作
1- Upload上传文件
2-Sign签名
3-drag拖拽到文档|Save保存
4-Send发送
5-e-sign电子签名|多签名操作
6-video录制语音
省略
7-最后的展现
文档、签名、更新日志和视频证明都可以用来做验证。
本文由博客一文多发平台 OpenWrite 发布!
本文由Rebase社区River【空乱木】整理和发布!
Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt三款去广告扩展的评测
日常生活中,广告一直充斥在互联网的方方面面,即使是一些大型的门户网站,为了商业目的,往往也会出现十分影响我们浏览体验的广告,就是这些广告消磨掉我们大量的时间与精力。
在这里小编给大家介绍三款广告拦截扩展:Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt。
1、三款扩展的界面设计对比
Adblock Plus:
uBlock Origin:
Cloudopt:
如图依次是Adblock Plus, uBlock Origin,Cloudopt三款去广告扩展。ABP的logo以红白搭配,容易第一眼就认出这个品牌。uBlock Origin的电源图标很醒目,功能多以图标展示,但缺少必要的文字描述,对于小白来说需要时间摸索。Cloudopt以紫色和白色为主色调,整体设计简洁。主界面展示的功能通过图标和数字的搭配,更让人会仔细去看它的功能说明。三款扩展的界面设计都有各自的特色,但Cloudopt的设计更让人喜欢。
2、三款扩展的功能布局
Adblock Plus和uBlock Origin的功能布局都侧重于我们会使用到的高频功能。比如对当前页面的广告拦截或者整个网域拦截,甚至是具体到对某一个元素的拦截。我们可以根据自己的需要自定义广告拦截的影响范围。这一点功能设计极其方便处理用户临时不需要拦截广告的需求。Cloudopt的功能布局和前两者略有不同。它的功能布局不局限于广告拦截。在它的功能布局上还包括当前访问网站的信誉评估分数,安全保护、实验室等功能。从安全浏览这一点出发考虑,查看网站的信誉帮助用户在拦截广告的同时,也能了解网站的安全性。
3、广告、钓鱼网站拦截效果对比
某游戏网站广告未被拦截之前:
3款扩展拦截之后:
某门户网站广告未被拦截之前:
Adblock Plus扩展拦截之后:
uBlock Origin拦截之后:
Cloudopt拦截之后:
我选取了一个游戏网站和门户网站进行测试,广告类型包括横幅广告和弹窗广告。对于游戏网站的测试,三款扩展都达到了拦截效果。拦截效果就不一一贴图了,大家可以去试试。在门户网站的测试中,我们可以看到Cloudopt与另两款扩展的相比,有一个广告区域没有拦截到。
秉持着探究精神,编者深入的了解下这三款软件的原理:
Adblock Plus:
uBlock Origin:
Cloudopt:
前两者是通过预先订阅某些过滤规则来达到拦截的效果,而Cloudopt有云中心,根据云中心和我们实际访问的网站来匹配最新的规则进行拦截。前两者往往需要有维护者去维护、更新这些规则,所以一旦需要新的规则来进行广告拦截,要么等维护者更新,要么就自己动手添加规则。可能从目前的测试结果来看,Cloudopt的效果可能没有那么好,不过基于云的技术给人带来了不少新意,而且根据编者的观察,不知道是不是因为基于云的关系,Cloudopt的内存占用和CPU占用明显小于另外两款。
三款扩展开启钓鱼网站拦截的方式不相同。
Adblock Plus需要在选项设置中添加恶意域名的过滤规则订阅组:
uBlock Origin默认订阅了常见恶意域名规则:
Cloudopt的恶意域名拦截则是根据网站信誉评估以及云安全中心匹配最新规则达到效果:
Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt三款扩展都有各自的特色。编者认为大家都可以按照自己的要求选择以上一款扩展。
懂得并且需要自定义订阅规则的用户不妨选择Adblock Plus。
uBlock Origin内存占用低,新手可以使用默认规则,高手可以自定义订阅规则。小白以及需要自定义规则的用户可以选择。
追求轻量级、设计好看、简单易用的用户我推荐Cloudopt。Cloudopt广告拦截是通过云中心与访问网站的通信来匹配最新规则,不需要用户自己去更新或自定义订阅规则。功能一键开启,对大部分用户来说容易上手。
block.ClusterBlockException: blocked by: [SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE/1/state not recovered / initialized];
[2019-06-19T16:54:52,915][WARN ][r.suppressed ] [node-1] path: /_cat/indices, params: {v=}
org.elasticsearch.cluster.block.ClusterBlockException: blocked by: [SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE/1/state not recovered / initialized];
at org.elasticsearch.cluster.block.ClusterBlocks.globalBlockedException(ClusterBlocks.java:166) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.indices.stats.TransportIndicesStatsAction.checkGlobalBlock(TransportIndicesStatsAction.java:71) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.indices.stats.TransportIndicesStatsAction.checkGlobalBlock(TransportIndicesStatsAction.java:48) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.broadcast.node.TransportBroadcastByNodeAction$AsyncAction.<init>(TransportBroadcastByNodeAction.java:255) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.broadcast.node.TransportBroadcastByNodeAction.doExecute(TransportBroadcastByNodeAction.java:233) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.broadcast.node.TransportBroadcastByNodeAction.doExecute(TransportBroadcastByNodeAction.java:78) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$RequestFilterChain.proceed(TransportAction.java:167) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.action.filter.SecurityActionFilter.apply(SecurityActionFilter.java:126) ~[?:?]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$RequestFilterChain.proceed(TransportAction.java:165) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction.execute(TransportAction.java:139) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction.execute(TransportAction.java:81) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.node.NodeClient.executeLocally(NodeClient.java:87) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.node.NodeClient.doExecute(NodeClient.java:76) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient.execute(AbstractClient.java:395) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient$IndicesAdmin.execute(AbstractClient.java:1248) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient$IndicesAdmin.stats(AbstractClient.java:1569) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.cat.RestIndicesAction$1$1.processResponse(RestIndicesAction.java:121) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.cat.RestIndicesAction$1$1.processResponse(RestIndicesAction.java:114) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.RestActionListener.onResponse(RestActionListener.java:47) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$1.onResponse(TransportAction.java:85) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$1.onResponse(TransportAction.java:81) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction$AsyncSingleAction$1.onResponse(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:178) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction$AsyncSingleAction$1.onResponse(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:175) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.health.TransportClusterHealthAction$3.onNewClusterState(TransportClusterHealthAction.java:178) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.health.TransportClusterHealthAction.executeHealth(TransportClusterHealthAction.java:193) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.health.TransportClusterHealthAction.masterOperation(TransportClusterHealthAction.java:140) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.admin.cluster.health.TransportClusterHealthAction.masterOperation(TransportClusterHealthAction.java:50) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction$AsyncSingleAction$2.doRun(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:195) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.AbstractRunnable.run(AbstractRunnable.java:37) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.common.util.concurrent.EsExecutors$1.execute(EsExecutors.java:135) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction$AsyncSingleAction.doStart(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:192) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction$AsyncSingleAction.start(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:148) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction.doExecute(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:125) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.master.TransportMasterNodeAction.doExecute(TransportMasterNodeAction.java:56) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$RequestFilterChain.proceed(TransportAction.java:167) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.xpack.security.action.filter.SecurityActionFilter.apply(SecurityActionFilter.java:126) ~[?:?]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction$RequestFilterChain.proceed(TransportAction.java:165) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction.execute(TransportAction.java:139) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.action.support.TransportAction.execute(TransportAction.java:81) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.node.NodeClient.executeLocally(NodeClient.java:87) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.node.NodeClient.doExecute(NodeClient.java:76) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient.execute(AbstractClient.java:395) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient$ClusterAdmin.execute(AbstractClient.java:702) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.client.support.AbstractClient$ClusterAdmin.health(AbstractClient.java:723) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.cat.RestIndicesAction$1.processResponse(RestIndicesAction.java:114) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.cat.RestIndicesAction$1.processResponse(RestIndicesAction.java:93) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
at org.elasticsearch.rest.action.RestActionListener.onResponse(RestActionListener.java:47) ~[elasticsearch-6.5.4.jar:6.5.4]
c – 为什么push_back签名是void push_back(const value_type&val)不是void push_back(value_type val)?
为什么push_back的函数签名如下?
void push_back (const value_type& val);
传递的值被复制到容器中,为什么不将副本直接复制到参数列表中?
void push_back (value_type val);
解决方法
#include <iostream> using namespace std; struct A { A() {} A(A const& copy) { cout << "Came to A::A(A const& copy)\n"; } void print() const { cout << "Came to A:print()\n"; } }; void foo(A const& a) { A copy = a; copy.print(); } void bar(A a) { A copy = a; copy.print(); } int main() { A a; foo(a); bar(a); }
运行程序的输出:
Came to A::A(A const& copy) Came to A:print() Came to A::A(A const& copy) Came to A::A(A const& copy) Came to A:print()
注意由于调用bar而对复制构造函数的附加调用.对于某些对象,当操作执行数百万次时,额外的复制结构和相应的破坏可能非常昂贵.
今天的关于BLOCK_TYPE_US_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)的分享已经结束,谢谢您的关注,如果想了解更多关于009-blockusign-基于blockstack的加密文档签名工具dapp、Adblock Plus、uBlock Origin、Cloudopt三款去广告扩展的评测、block.ClusterBlockException: blocked by: [SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE/1/state not recovered / initialized];、c – 为什么push_back签名是void push_back(const value_type&val)不是void push_back(value_type val)?的相关知识,请在本站进行查询。
本文标签: